The fuss behind the feed.

Corrections Policy

FeedFuss aims to publish accurate, fair, and useful coverage of internet culture. Because online stories move quickly, some details may change after publication or require clarification.

This Corrections Policy explains how we handle corrections and updates.

How to request a correction

If you believe an article contains an error, missing context, outdated information, unclear wording, or a misattribution, please contact us through the Contact page.

Please include:

  • The article title or URL
  • The specific sentence, claim, or section you are referring to
  • What you believe is incorrect or incomplete
  • A source, link, screenshot, or explanation that supports the correction
  • Your name and contact information, if you want a response

What we review

We may review correction requests involving:

  • Incorrect names, dates, links, or timelines
  • Misattributed quotes, videos, posts, or screenshots
  • Missing context that changes the meaning of a story
  • Outdated information in developing internet stories
  • Unclear distinctions between claims, allegations, opinions, and confirmed facts
  • Broken links or source problems

How corrections are handled

If we determine that a correction is needed, we may:

  • Fix the error directly
  • Add clarifying language
  • Update the article with new information
  • Add an editor’s note, update note, or correction note
  • Remove or replace a source, embed, image, or reference if appropriate

Minor fixes, such as spelling, formatting, grammar, or broken links, may be corrected without a formal note.

Substantive changes may include a visible update or correction note when appropriate.

Updates to developing stories

Internet culture stories often evolve quickly. A post may be updated when new context, creator statements, platform actions, or public responses become available.

An update does not always mean the original article was wrong. It may reflect new information or a developing situation.

Removal requests

We do not remove accurate editorial content simply because someone dislikes it. However, we will review requests involving privacy, safety, copyright, misidentification, outdated personal information, or serious harm.

Last updated

June 16, 2026